Psychiatry’s Guide Is Out of Touch With Science, Experts Say

By Pam Belluck and Benedict Carey

Reprinted from The New York Times, May 6, 2013

Just weeks before the long-awaited publication of a new edition of the so-called bible of mental disorders, the federal government’s most prominent psychiatric expert has said the book suffers from a scientific “lack of validity.”

The expert, Dr. Thomas R. Insel, director of the National Institute of Mental Health, said in an interview Monday that his goal was to reshape the direction of psychiatric research to focus on biology, genetics and neuroscience so that scientists can define disorders by their causes, rather than their symptoms.

While the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, or D.S.M., is the best tool now available for clinicians treating patients and should not be tossed out, he said, it does not reflect the complexity of many disorders, and its way of categorizing mental illnesses should not guide research.

“As long as the research community takes the D.S.M. to be a bible, we’ll never make progress,” Dr. Insel said, adding, “People think that everything has to match D.S.M. criteria, but you know what? Biology never read that book.”

The revision, known as the D.S.M.-5, is the first major reissue since 1994. It has stirred unprecedented questioning from the public, patient groups and, most fundamentally, senior figures in psychiatry who have challenged not only decisions about specific diagnoses but the scientific basis of the entire enterprise. Basic research into the biology of mental disorders and treatment has stalled, they say, confounded by the labyrinth of the brain.

Decades of spending on neuroscience have taught scientists mostly what they do not know, undermining some of their most elemental assumptions. Genetic glitches that appear to increase the risk of schizophrenia in one person may predispose others to autism-like symptoms, or bipolar disorder. The mechanisms of the field’s most commonly used drugs — antidepressants like Prozac, and antipsychosis medications like Zyprexa — have revealed nothing about the causes of those disorders. And major drugmakers have scaled back psychiatric drug development, having virtually no new biological “targets” to shoot for.

Dr. Insel is one of a growing number of scientists who think that the field needs an entirely new paradigm for understanding mental disorders, though neither he nor anyone else knows exactly what it will look like.

Even the chairman of the task force making revisions to the D.S.M., Dr. David J. Kupfer, a professor of psychiatry at the University of Pittsburgh, said the new manual was faced with doing the best it could with the scientific evidence available.

“The problem that we’ve had in dealing with the data that we’ve had over the five to 10 years since we began the revision process of D.S.M.-5 is a failure of our neuroscience and biology to give us the level of diagnostic criteria, a level of sensitivity and specificity that we would be able to introduce into the diagnostic manual,” Dr. Kupfer said.

The creators of the D.S.M. in the 1960s and ’70s “were real heroes at the time,” said Dr. Steven E. Hyman, a psychiatrist and neuroscientist at the Broad Institute and a former director at the National Institute of Mental Health. “They chose a model in which all psychiatric illnesses were represented as categories discontinuous with ‘normal.’ But this is totally wrong in a way they couldn’t have imagined. So in fact what they produced was an absolute scientific nightmare. Many people who get one diagnosis get five diagnoses, but they don’t have five diseases — they have one underlying condition.”

Dr. Hyman, Dr. Insel and other experts said they hoped that the science of psychiatry would follow the direction of cancer research, which is moving from classifying tumors by where they occur in the body to characterizing them by their genetic and molecular signatures.

About two years ago, to spur a move in that direction, Dr. Insel started a federal project called Research Domain Criteria, or RDoC, which he highlighted in a blog post last week. Dr. Insel said in the blog that the National Institute of Mental Health would be “reorienting its research away from D.S.M. categories” because “patients with mental disorders deserve better.” His commentary has created ripples throughout the mental health community.

Dr. Insel said in the interview that his motivation was not to disparage the D.S.M. as a clinical tool, but to encourage researchers and especially outside reviewers who screen proposals for financing from his agency to disregard its categories and investigate the biological underpinnings of disorders instead. He said he had heard from scientists whose proposals to study processes common to depression, schizophrenia and psychosis were rejected by grant reviewers because they cut across D.S.M. disease categories.

“They didn’t get it,” Dr. Insel said of the reviewers. “What we’re trying to do with RDoC is say actually this is a fresh way to think about it.” He added that he hoped researchers would also participate in projects funded through the Obama administration’s new brain initiative.

Dr. Michael First, a psychiatry professor at Columbia who edited the last edition of the manual, said, “RDoC is clearly the way of the future,” although it would take years to get results that could apply to patients. In the meantime, he said, “RDoC can’t do what the D.S.M. does. The D.S.M. is what clinicians use. Patients will always come into offices with symptoms.”

For at least a decade, Dr. First and others said, patients will continue to be diagnosed with D.S.M. categories as a guide, and insurance companies will reimburse with such diagnoses in mind.

Dr. Jeffrey Lieberman, the chairman of the psychiatry department at Columbia and president-elect of the American Psychiatric Association, which publishes the D.S.M., said that the new edition’s refinements were “based on research in the last 20 years that will improve the utility of this guide for practitioners, and improve, however incrementally, the care patients receive.”

He added: “The last thing we want to do is be defensive or apologetic about the state of our field. But at the same time, we’re not satisfied with it either. There’s nothing we’d like better than to have more scientific progress.”

A version of this article appeared in print on May 7, 2013, on page A13 of the New York edition with the headline: Psychiatry’s New Guide Falls Short, Experts Say.

  1. Pingback: pickleball paddle
  2. Pingback: water slides
  3. Pingback: interserver coupon
  4. Pingback: must see
  5. Pingback: click here
  6. Pingback: read more
  7. Pingback: new website
  8. Pingback: useful reference
  9. Pingback: my company
  10. Pingback: original site
  11. Pingback: Continued
  12. Pingback: Discover More
  13. Pingback: click resources
  14. Pingback: content
  15. Pingback: see post
  16. Pingback: look here
  17. Pingback: read more
  18. Pingback: best info
  19. Pingback: new website
  20. Pingback: news
  21. Pingback: how to
  22. Pingback: about
  23. Pingback: useful reference
  24. Pingback: imp source
  25. Pingback: a fantastic read
  26. Pingback: my response
  27. Pingback: their explanation
  28. Pingback: Visit Website
  29. Pingback: her latest blog
  30. Pingback: More Bonuses
  31. Pingback: you could try here
  32. Pingback: Learn More
  33. Pingback: Get the facts
  34. Pingback: official statement
  35. Pingback: click here
  36. Pingback: read more
  37. Pingback: click here
  38. Pingback: click here
  39. Pingback: click here
  40. Pingback: read more
  41. Pingback: read more
  42. Pingback: read more
  43. Pingback: read more
  44. Pingback: website
  45. Pingback: click here
  46. Pingback: more news
  47. Pingback: official site
  48. Pingback: her latest blog
  49. Pingback: Clicking Here
  50. Pingback: More hints
  51. Pingback: best value
  52. Pingback: new source
  53. Pingback: best news
  54. Pingback: click here
  55. Pingback: read more
  56. Pingback: important
  57. Pingback: figure out
  58. Pingback: continue reading
  59. Pingback: where to look
  60. Pingback: insight
  61. Pingback: quality article
  62. Pingback: quality article
  63. Pingback: Sperry boots
  64. Pingback: useful reference
  65. Pingback: Homepage
  66. Pingback: a fantastic read
  67. Pingback: find this
  68. Pingback: browse this site
  69. Pingback: my response
  70. Pingback: More hints
  71. Pingback: Get the facts
  72. Pingback: official statement
  73. Pingback: try this web-site
  74. Pingback: read more
  75. Pingback: check my blog
  76. Pingback: click site
  77. Pingback: my review here
  78. Pingback: useful reference
  79. Pingback: Get More Info
  80. Pingback: see here
  81. Pingback: this website
  82. Pingback: great post to read
  83. Pingback: my company
  84. Pingback: click to read more
  85. Pingback: find more info
  86. Pingback: see it here
  87. Pingback: Homepage
  88. Pingback: a fantastic read
  89. Pingback: find this
  90. Pingback: Bonuses
  91. Pingback: read this article
  92. Pingback: click here now
  93. Pingback: browse this site
  94. Pingback: check here
  95. Pingback: original site
  96. Pingback: my response
  97. Pingback: this page
  98. Pingback: news
  99. Pingback: click here
  100. Pingback: click here
  101. Pingback: click here
  102. Pingback: read more
  103. Pingback: read more
  104. Pingback: read more
  105. Pingback: what is new
  106. Pingback: what is new
  107. Pingback: what is new
  108. Pingback: what is new
  109. Pingback: aloe vera for acne
  110. Pingback: aloe vera for acne
  111. Pingback: more info
  112. Pingback: click here
  113. Pingback: read article
  114. Pingback: source
  115. Pingback: important
  116. Pingback: news
  117. Pingback: url
  118. Pingback: niagen reviews
  119. Pingback: niagen
  120. Pingback: read more
  121. Pingback: find now
  122. Pingback: news
  123. Pingback: important
  124. Pingback: new article
  125. Pingback: best information
  126. Pingback: exceptional
  127. Pingback: see this here
  128. Pingback: Visit Website
  129. Pingback: home page
  130. Pingback: check my site
  131. Pingback: More Bonuses
  132. Pingback: click resources
  133. Pingback: Get the facts
  134. Pingback: official statement
  135. Pingback: you can look here
  136. Pingback: her explanation
  137. Pingback: why not try here
  138. Pingback: informative post
  139. Pingback: click here
  140. Pingback: read more
  141. Pingback: info
  142. Pingback: website
  143. Pingback: news
  144. Pingback: link
  145. Pingback: best source
  146. Pingback: ebook
  147. Pingback: next
  148. Pingback: visit site
  149. Pingback: look here
  150. Pingback: Going Here
  151. Pingback: click to read
  152. Pingback: a knockout post
  153. Pingback: look at here now
  154. Pingback: important link
  155. Pingback: Extra resources
  156. Pingback: probiotics america
  157. Pingback: Niagen review
  158. Pingback: click here
  159. Pingback: read more
  160. Pingback: website
  161. Pingback: webpage
  162. Pingback: visit them
  163. Pingback: important
  164. Pingback: news
  165. Pingback: best info
  166. Pingback: information
  167. Pingback: information
  168. Pingback: webpage
  169. Pingback: best source
  170. Pingback: click here
  171. Pingback: Source
  172. Pingback: have a peek here
  173. Pingback: Check This Out
  174. Pingback: this contact form
  175. Pingback: navigate here
  176. Pingback: weblink
  177. Pingback: check over here
  178. Pingback: this content
  179. Pingback: click here
  180. Pingback: Source
  181. Pingback: have a peek here
  182. Pingback: Check This Out
  183. Pingback: this contact form
  184. Pingback: navigate here
  185. Pingback: weblink
  186. Pingback: check over here
  187. Pingback: this content
  188. Pingback: check my blog
  189. Pingback: his explanation
  190. Pingback: more info here
  191. Pingback: official site
  192. Pingback: look at this site
  193. Pingback: visit
  194. Pingback: check it out
  195. Pingback: see this
  196. Pingback: directory
  197. Pingback: see this here
  198. Pingback: see this here
  199. Pingback: feres
  200. Pingback: feres inşaat
  201. Pingback: feres gayrimenkul
  202. Pingback: feres
  203. Pingback: feres
  204. Pingback: additional hints
  205. Pingback: Bonuses
  206. Pingback: a fantastic read
  207. Pingback: find more info
  208. Pingback: find more info
  209. Pingback: great post to read
  210. Pingback: my company
  211. Pingback: useful reference
  212. Pingback: my review here
  213. Pingback: click here
  214. Pingback: midogen reviews
  215. Pingback: midogen review
  216. Pingback: click here
  217. Pingback: midogen
  218. Pingback: midogen reviews
  219. Pingback: niagen
  220. Pingback: niagen review
  221. Pingback: niagen review
  222. Pingback: read more
  223. Pingback: More Bonuses
  224. Pingback: check my source
  225. Pingback: Check This Out
  226. Pingback: navigate here
  227. Pingback: Source
  228. Pingback: additional reading
  229. Pingback: great post to read
  230. Pingback: advice
  231. Pingback: more information
  232. Pingback: Related Site
  233. Pingback: useful link
  234. Pingback: useful link
  235. Pingback: pop over here
  236. Pingback: Full Article
  237. Pingback: read more
  238. Pingback: click here
  239. Pingback: pop over here
  240. Pingback: Full Article
  241. Pingback: read more
  242. Pingback: click here
  243. Pingback: pop over here
  244. Pingback: click here
  245. Pingback: pop over here
  246. Pingback: Full Article
  247. Pingback: read more
  248. Pingback: click here
  249. Pingback: Full Article
  250. Pingback: read more
  251. Pingback: original site
  252. Pingback: click site
  253. Pingback: news
  254. Pingback: this content
  255. Pingback: click here
  256. Pingback: check over here
  257. Pingback: check my blog
  258. Pingback: my company
  259. Pingback: imp source
  260. Pingback: this page
  261. Pingback: Get More Info
  262. Pingback: Homepage
  263. Pingback: great post to read
  264. Pingback: useful reference
  265. Pingback: my review here
  266. Pingback: a fantastic read
  267. Pingback: official site
  268. Pingback: directory
  269. Pingback: his explanation
  270. Pingback: browse this site
  271. Pingback: dig this
  272. Pingback: read this article
  273. Pingback: original site
  274. Pingback: Bonuses
  275. Pingback: look at this site
  276. Pingback: page
  277. Pingback: her latest blog
  278. Pingback: additional hints
  279. Pingback: More Bonuses
  280. Pingback: Continued
  281. Pingback: this content
  282. Pingback: weblink
  283. Pingback: navigate here
  284. Pingback: this contact form
  285. Pingback: have a peek here
  286. Pingback: Source
  287. Pingback: check my blog
  288. Pingback: great post to read
  289. Pingback: see here
  290. Pingback: useful reference
  291. Pingback: Get More Info
  292. Pingback: click site
  293. Pingback: my review here
  294. Pingback: news
  295. Pingback: my company

Comments are closed.